In Re Rodriguez-Lafrasse
In Re Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE CLAIRE RODRIGUEZ-LAFRASSE, ELIE HADCHITY, ______________________
2014-1545 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/528,118. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARINA T. LARSON, Larson and Anderson, LLC, Dil- lon, CO, argued for appellants.
JAMIE LYNNE SIMPSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JEREMIAH HELM. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and BRYSON, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 6, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished