In Re Rodriguez-Lafrasse
In Re Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE CLAIRE RODRIGUEZ-LAFRASSE, ELIE HADCHITY, ______________________ 2014-1545 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/528,118. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MARINA T. LARSON, Larson and Anderson, LLC, Dil- lon, CO, argued for appellants.
JAMIE LYNNE SIMPSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN K.
KELLEY, JEREMIAH HELM. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 6, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.