NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SOFTVIEW LLC, Appellant

v.

KYOCERA CORPORATION, MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, Appellees ______________________

2014-1599 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00004, IPR2013-00257. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MORGAN CHU, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMUEL KAI LU, ALAN J. HEINRICH.

ERIC C. COHEN, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee Kyocera Corporation. Also represented by MICHAEL TOMSA, MICHAEL ADAM DORFMAN. JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, argued for appellee Motorola Mobility LLC. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES; DAVID A. REED, CANDICE C. DECAIRE, ALYSON L. WOOTEN, WILLIAM HENRY BOICE, Atlanta, GA; CHRISTOPHER SCHENCK, Seattle, WA.

JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, NATHAN K. KELLEY. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court