In Re Douglass
In Re Douglass
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE ANDREW IAN DOUGLASS
______________________
2014-1207 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 09/527,507. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN THOMAS HARDING, Morrison Mahoney, LLP, Boston, MA argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH B. MILSTEIN, Milstein Zhang & Wu LLC, Newton, MA.
JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMIE LYNNE SIMPSON, NATHAN K. KELLEY. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished