E-Lynxx Corporation v. Innerworkings, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ E-LYNXX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v.
INNERWORKINGS, INC., CIRQIT.COM, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees ______________________
2014-1349 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in No. 1:10-cv-02535- CCC, Chief Judge Christopher Conner.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
DARREN PATRICK NICHOLSON, Sayles Werbner, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represent- ed by MARK STRACHAN; JONATHAN TAD SUDER, BRETT MICHAEL PINKUS, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX.
DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee InnerWorkings, Inc. Also represented by ADAM CONRAD, Charlotte, NC; JENNIFER H. DOAN, JOSHUA R. THANE, Haltom & Doan, Texarkana, TX.
JENNIFER E. HOEKEL, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, for defendant-appellee Cirqit.com, Inc. Also represented by JESSICA MENDEZ, RICHARD L. BROPHY.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.