Katsouros v. Oac
Katsouros v. Oac
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ANTHONY KATSOUROS, Petitioner
v.
OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL, OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondents ______________________
2014-6001 ______________________
Petition for review of a decision of the Board of Direc- tors of the Office of Compliance in No. 09-AC-10. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JEFFREY HOWARD LEIB, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
IMRAN RAZA ZAIDI, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of the Architect of the Capi- tol. Also represented by STUART F. DELERY and MARLEIGH D. DOVER. JOHN UELMEN, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of Compliance. Also represented by AMY VICTORIA DUNNING. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (TARANTO, CLEVENGER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished