Howard v. Air Force
Howard v. Air Force
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SHERMAN HOWARD, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent ______________________
2014-3116, 2014-3121 ______________________
Petitions for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA-0752-09-0172-C-1, DA-0752-13-0089-I-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARSHALL DECEDERIL WHITE, Law Office of Marshall D. White, San Antonio, TX, argued for petitioner.
ANNA BONDURANT ELEY, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC argued for respondent. Also represented by JOSHUA E. KURLAND, JOYCE R. BRANDA, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BRYANT G. SNEE. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished