Rydex, Ltd. v. Ford Motor Company
Rydex, Ltd. v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
RYDEX, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. (DOING BUSINESS AS MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN OPERATIONS), Defendants-Cross Appellants
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., Defendants ______________________
2013-1462, 2013-1463 ______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0122, Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STAMATIOS STAMOULIS, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
DOMINIC FRANCIS PERELLA, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellants. Also represented by JASON R. MUDD, Erise IP, P.A., Over- land Park, KS. JEFFREY SCOTT PATTERSON, Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP, Dallas, TX, for defendant-cross appellant Nissan North America, Inc. ERIC W. SCHWEIBENZ, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neu- stadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff-cross appellant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Also represented by RICHARD D. KELLY, ROBERT CARTER MATTSON. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 18, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished