Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MAYFAIR WIRELESS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, VERIZON WIRELESS, AT&T MOBILITY LLC, T-MOBILE USA, INC., SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________

2014-1587 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-00772-GMS-SRF, Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DANIEL AARON KOTCHEN, Kotchen & Low LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represent- ed by MICHAEL JOHN VON KLEMPERER.

JOHNATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellees. Defendant-appellee Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless, also represented by GEOFFREY P. EATON, ANDREW RYAN SOMMER, CHARLES B. MOLSTER, III, ERIC M. GOLDSTEIN, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC. Defendant- appellee AT&T Mobility LLC, also represented by JOSEPH P. ZAMMIT, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, New York, NY; RICHARD STEPHEN ZEMBEK, DANIEL LEVENTHAL, Norton Rose Fulbright, Houston, TX; SHEILA KADURA, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, Austin, TX. Defendant-appellee T- Mobile USA, Inc., also represented by SHANNON JOST, Stokes Lawrence, P.S., Seattle WA; JOHN W. SHAW, Shaw Keller, Wilmington, DE. Defendant-appellee Sprint Nextel Corporation, also represented by KAREN ANN JACOBS, JENNIFER YING, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP. Wilmington, DE. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished