Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership
Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MAYFAIR WIRELESS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, VERIZON WIRELESS, AT&T MOBILITY LLC, T-MOBILE USA, INC., SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2014-1587 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-00772-GMS-SRF, Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DANIEL AARON KOTCHEN, Kotchen & Low LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represent- ed by MICHAEL JOHN VON KLEMPERER.
JOHNATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellees.
Defendant-appellee Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless, also represented by GEOFFREY P. EATON, ANDREW RYAN SOMMER, CHARLES B. MOLSTER, III, ERIC M. GOLDSTEIN, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC. Defendant- appellee AT&T Mobility LLC, also represented by JOSEPH P. ZAMMIT, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, New York, NY; RICHARD STEPHEN ZEMBEK, DANIEL LEVENTHAL, Norton Rose Fulbright, Houston, TX; SHEILA KADURA, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, Austin, TX. Defendant-appellee T- Mobile USA, Inc., also represented by SHANNON JOST, Stokes Lawrence, P.S., Seattle WA; JOHN W. SHAW, Shaw Keller, Wilmington, DE. Defendant-appellee Sprint Nextel Corporation, also represented by KAREN ANN JACOBS, JENNIFER YING, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP. Wilmington, DE. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.