Hunter-El v. United States
Hunter-El v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SHEIK AARON HUNTER-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2014-5122 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14-CV-00139-FMA, Judge Francis M. Allegra. ______________________
Decided: March 16, 2015 ______________________
SHEIK AARON HUNTER-EL, Adelanto, CA, pro se.
PETER KRZYWICKI, Environment & Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ROBERT G. DREHER. ______________________ 2 HUNTER-EL v. US
PER CURIAM. Sheik Aaron Hunter-El appeals the dismissal of his complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims for lack of prosecution. Under Rule 41(b) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims, the court may dismiss a case if the plaintiff fails to prosecute. Having reviewed the papers and Mr. Hunter-El’s brief, we conclude that the Court of Federal Claims did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Mr. Hunter-El’s complaint. See Claude E. Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 899 F.2d 1180, 1183 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we affirm. AFFIRMED COSTS No costs.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished