NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: EIDOS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Appellant ______________________ 2014-1658 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,898. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROBERT C. NISSEN, McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by SONG JUNG, CARL PAUL BRETSCHER.

JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court