In Re: Hardy
In Re: Hardy
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: CHRISTOPHER HARDY, R. NEAL POST, Appellants ______________________ 2014-1577 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 29/268,198. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PERRY J. SAIDMAN, Saidman DesignLaw Group, Silver Spring, MD, argued for appellants.
BRIAN THOMAS RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, WILLIAM LAMARCA, THOMAS W.
KRAUSE. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.