Archuleta v. Hopper
Archuleta v. Hopper
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
KATHERINE ARCHULETA, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Petitioner
v.
TONY D. HOPPER, Respondent
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent ______________________
2013-3177 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH0731090798-I-3. ______________________
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC ______________________ 2 ARCHULETA v. HOPPER
Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM. ORDER Katherine Archuleta, Director of the Office of Per- sonnel Management (“OPM”), filed a petition for rehear- ing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by both respondents Tony D. Hopper and the Merit Systems Protection Board. The petition was first referred as a petition for rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehear- ing en banc was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
The mandate of this court will issue on May 20, 2015.
FOR THE COURT
May 13, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
* Circuit Judge Hughes did not participate.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished