Benecke-Kaliko Ag v. the Haartz Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Benecke-Kaliko Ag v. the Haartz Corporation

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BENECKE-KALIKO AG, Appellant

v.

THE HAARTZ CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________

2015-1110 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,611. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MARK D. KLINKO, Fay Sharpe, LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by JUDE A. FRY.

STEVEN JAY GROSSMAN, Grossman Tucker Perreault & Pfleger, PLLC, Manchester, NH, argued for appellee. Also represented by BETH A. FILIP. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished