Benecke-Kaliko Ag v. the Haartz Corporation
Benecke-Kaliko Ag v. the Haartz Corporation
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BENECKE-KALIKO AG, Appellant
v.
THE HAARTZ CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________
2015-1110 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,611. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARK D. KLINKO, Fay Sharpe, LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by JUDE A. FRY.
STEVEN JAY GROSSMAN, Grossman Tucker Perreault & Pfleger, PLLC, Manchester, NH, argued for appellee. Also represented by BETH A. FILIP. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished