MacRo-z Technology v. Navy
MacRo-z Technology v. Navy
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MACRO-Z TECHNOLOGY, Appellant v. RAYMOND E. MABUS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Appellee ______________________ 2015-1025 ______________________ Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in No. 56711, Administrative Judge Mark A.
Melnick, Administrative Judge David W. James, Jr., Administrative Judge Mark N. Stempler. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES FRANCIS NAGLE, Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant.
JAMES PATRICK CONNOR, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also repre- sented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BRYANT G. SNEE; ROBYN L. HAMADY, General Litigation Division, United States Department of the Navy, Wash- ington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 13, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.