Bobel v. Itc

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Bobel v. Itc

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ANDRZEJ BOBEL, NEPTUN LIGHT, INC., Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

SATCO PRODUCTS, INC., MAXLITE, INC., LITETRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Intervenors ______________________

2014-1701 ______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-872. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU, The Fuisz-Kundu Group LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOHN ROBERT FUISZ.

ROBERT JOHN NEEDHAM, Office of General Counsel, International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, ar- gued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, DOMINIC L. BIANCHI.

ROBERT STEPHEN RIGG, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, argued for intervenors. Interve- nors Litetronics International, Inc., MaxLite, Inc., also represented by TIMOTHY MICHAEL NITSCH. Intervenor Satco Products, Inc., represented by ROBERT P. LYNN, JR., STEPHEN WILLIAM LIVINGSTON, Lynn, Gartner, Dunne & Covello, LLP, Mineola, NY. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 14, 2015 /s/Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished