Bobel v. Itc
Bobel v. Itc
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANDRZEJ BOBEL, NEPTUN LIGHT, INC., Appellants v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee SATCO PRODUCTS, INC., MAXLITE, INC., LITETRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Intervenors ______________________ 2014-1701 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-872. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU, The Fuisz-Kundu Group LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOHN ROBERT FUISZ.
ROBERT JOHN NEEDHAM, Office of General Counsel, International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, ar- gued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE W.
HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, DOMINIC L.
BIANCHI.
ROBERT STEPHEN RIGG, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, argued for intervenors. Interve- nors Litetronics International, Inc., MaxLite, Inc., also represented by TIMOTHY MICHAEL NITSCH. Intervenor Satco Products, Inc., represented by ROBERT P. LYNN, JR., STEPHEN WILLIAM LIVINGSTON, Lynn, Gartner, Dunne & Covello, LLP, Mineola, NY. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 14, 2015 /s/Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.