NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION, DOMAINE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., Defendants-Appellees

TPV TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, TOP VICTORY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO., LTD., TPV ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TPV INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC., ENVISION PERIPHERALS, INC., Defendants-Appellees

ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees

AOC INTERNATIONAL, Defendant ______________________

2015-1125, -1126, -1127 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 9:12-cv-80694-PAS, 9:12-cv-80697-PAS, 9:12-cv-80701-PAS, Judge Patricia A. Seitz. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

GREGORY N. STILLMAN, Hunton & Williams LLP, Nor- folk, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represent- ed by OZZIE FARRES, MICHAEL ALFRED O’SHEA, Washington, DC.

JONATHAN HACKER, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defend- ants-appellees TPV Technology Limited, Top Victory International Limited, et al., also represented by MARK A. SAMUELS, BRIAN BERLINER, VISION WINTER, Los Angeles, CA.

JOSHUA M. MASUR, Turner Boyd LLP, Redwood City, CA, for defendants-appellees Asus Computer Internation- al, Asustek Computer Inc. Also represented by ZHUANJIA GU.

CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood City, CA, for defendants-appellees Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation. Also represented by MICHAEL CHAOCHA TING. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 3

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court