Shoemake v. McDonald
Shoemake v. McDonald
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
RONALD K. SHOEMAKE, Claimant-Appellant
v.
ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________
2015-7005 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 13-196, Judge Coral Wong Pi- etsch. ______________________
Decided: September 14, 2015 ______________________
KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.
RENEE GERBER, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDER ORLANDO CANIZARES, SCOTT D. AUSTIN, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BENJAMIN C. MIZER; MARTIE ADELMAN, DAVID J. BARRANS, Office of General Counsel, 2 SHOEMAKE v. MCDONALD
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washing- ton, DC. ______________________
Before DYK, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2). DISMISSED
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished