Shoemake v. McDonald

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Shoemake v. McDonald

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

RONALD K. SHOEMAKE, Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________

2015-7005 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 13-196, Judge Coral Wong Pi- etsch. ______________________

Decided: September 14, 2015 ______________________

KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.

RENEE GERBER, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDER ORLANDO CANIZARES, SCOTT D. AUSTIN, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BENJAMIN C. MIZER; MARTIE ADELMAN, DAVID J. BARRANS, Office of General Counsel, 2 SHOEMAKE v. MCDONALD

United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washing- ton, DC. ______________________

Before DYK, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2). DISMISSED

Reference

Status
Unpublished