NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., Appellant ______________________

2015-1170 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 90/012,036. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

LOWELL D. MEAD, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by LORI R. MASON; FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Reston, VA.

ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, STACY BETH MARGOLIES. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court