NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., Appellant ______________________ 2015-1170 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 90/012,036. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ LOWELL D. MEAD, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by LORI R. MASON; FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Reston, VA. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, STACY BETH MARGOLIES. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court