NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ALEXANDER SHUKH, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, Defendants-Appellees

UNKNOWN OWNERS AND ASSIGNEES, Defendant

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2015-1012 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 0:10-cv-00404-JRT-JJK, Judge John R. Tunheim. ______________________

Decided: October 2, 2015 ______________________

CONSTANTINE JOHN GEKAS, Gekas Law Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 2 SHUKH v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC

CHAD DROWN, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneap- olis, MN, argued for defendants-appellees. Also repre- sented by DAVID J.F. GROSS, CHARLES FEENEY KNAPP, ELIZABETH COWAN WRIGHT, AARON D. VAN OORT; CALVIN L. LITSEY, East Palo Alto, CA. ______________________

Before MOORE, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In light of our holding in Shukh v. Seagate Technolo- gy, LLC, Case No. 14-1406, vacating and remanding in part the district court’s judgment on the merits against Alexander Shukh, we vacate and remand the district court’s costs judgment. VACATED AND REMANDED COSTS No costs.