Aiken v. Army
Aiken v. Army
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
KEITH N. AIKEN, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent ______________________
2015-3180 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA-0752-14-0152-I-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
KEITH N. AIKEN, Vine Grove, KY, pro se.
ALEXANDER ORLANDO CANIZARES, Commercial Litiga- tion Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. Also represent- ed by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., DEBORAH A. BYNUM. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 11, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished