Aiken v. Army
Aiken v. Army
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ KEITH N. AIKEN, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent ______________________ 2015-3180 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA-0752-14-0152-I-1. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ KEITH N. AIKEN, Vine Grove, KY, pro se.
ALEXANDER ORLANDO CANIZARES, Commercial Litiga- tion Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. Also represent- ed by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., DEBORAH A. BYNUM. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 11, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.