Trueposition Inc. v. Polaris Wireless, Inc.
Trueposition Inc. v. Polaris Wireless, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
TRUEPOSITION INC., Appellant
v.
POLARIS WIRELESS, INC., Appellee ______________________
2015-1330 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013- 00323. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL J. BONELLA, Condo Roccia Koptiw LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL JORDAN.
JASON PAUL DEMONT, Kaplan, Breyer, Schwarz & Ot- tesen, LLP, Matawan, NJ, argued for appellee. Also represented by KENNETH OTTESEN; VINCENT MCGEARY, MICHAEL CUKOR, McGeary Cukor LLC, Morristown, NJ; BRAD PEDERSEN, Patterson Thuente Pedersen, P.A., Minneapolis, MN. JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, JEREMIAH HELM. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished