NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: VI-JON, INC., Appellant ______________________

2015-1387 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,150. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ANDREW C. RYAN, Cantor Colburn LLP, Hartford, CT, argued for appellant.

SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, AMY J. NELSON. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 11, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court