Dyson v. Defense
Dyson v. Defense
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
WILLIAM E. DYSON, III, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent ______________________
2015-3076 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-0752-13-1235-I-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
WINDELL W. THOMAS, Fabayo & Associates, LLC, Sil- ver Spring, MD, argued for petitioner.
ERIN MURDOCK-PARK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., SCOTT D. AUSTIN, SOSUN BAE. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 12, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished