Dyson v. Defense

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Dyson v. Defense

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

WILLIAM E. DYSON, III, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent ______________________

2015-3076 ______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-0752-13-1235-I-1. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

WINDELL W. THOMAS, Fabayo & Associates, LLC, Sil- ver Spring, MD, argued for petitioner.

ERIN MURDOCK-PARK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., SCOTT D. AUSTIN, SOSUN BAE. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 12, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished