Interface, Inc. v. Tandus Centiva Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Interface, Inc. v. Tandus Centiva Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

INTERFACE, INC., Appellant

v.

TANDUS CENTIVA INC., Appellee ______________________

2015-1475, 2015-1668 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00333, IPR2013-00527. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

CANDICE C. DECAIRE, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC.

BARRY J. HERMAN, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellee. Also represent- ed by PRESTON HAMILTON HEARD, DANA E. STANO, Atlan- ta, GA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished