Interface, Inc. v. Tandus Centiva Inc.
Interface, Inc. v. Tandus Centiva Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
INTERFACE, INC., Appellant
v.
TANDUS CENTIVA INC., Appellee ______________________
2015-1475, 2015-1668 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00333, IPR2013-00527. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
CANDICE C. DECAIRE, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC.
BARRY J. HERMAN, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellee. Also represent- ed by PRESTON HAMILTON HEARD, DANA E. STANO, Atlan- ta, GA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (REYNA, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished