Phison Electronics Corp. v. Silicon Motion Technology
Phison Electronics Corp. v. Silicon Motion Technology
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP., Appellant
v.
SILICON MOTION TECHNOLOGY CORP., Appellee ______________________
2015-1632 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013- 00473. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DAVID MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID M. BARKAN, Redwood City, CA; PROSHANTO MUKHERJI, Boston, MA.
JASON ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN EDWARD WEED, DEVON C. BEANE; MELVIN CHAN, AKA Chan LLP, Santa Clara, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 11, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished