U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2016

Phison Electronics Corp. v. Silicon Motion Technology

Phison Electronics Corp. v. Silicon Motion Technology
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided February 11, 2016

Phison Electronics Corp. v. Silicon Motion Technology

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP., Appellant v. SILICON MOTION TECHNOLOGY CORP., Appellee ______________________ 2015-1632 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013- 00473. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DAVID MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID M. BARKAN, Redwood City, CA; PROSHANTO MUKHERJI, Boston, MA.

JASON ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN EDWARD WEED, DEVON C. BEANE; MELVIN CHAN, AKA Chan LLP, Santa Clara, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 11, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.