Johnson v. Navy
Johnson v. Navy
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEE JOHNSON, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent ______________________ 2015-3174 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-1221-14-0828-W-1. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PETER BROIDA, Arlington, VA, argued for petitioner.
SONIA MARIE ORFIELD, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD; TRACEY R. ROCKENBACH, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of the Navy, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 17, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.