Dawson v. United States
Dawson v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
LEE DAWSON, ON HIS OWN BEHALF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARY SITUATED, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2014-5115 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00297-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DANIEL BERKO, Law Office of Daniel Berko, San Fran- cisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
TANYA KOENIG, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., REGINALD T. BLADES, JR. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 21, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished