Dawson v. United States
Dawson v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEE DAWSON, ON HIS OWN BEHALF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARY SITUATED, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2014-5115 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00297-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G.
Bruggink. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DANIEL BERKO, Law Office of Daniel Berko, San Fran- cisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
TANYA KOENIG, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., REGINALD T. BLADES, JR. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 21, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.