Endotach LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.
Endotach LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ENDOTACH LLC, Appellant v. MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., Appellees ______________________ 2015-1784 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00100. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JONATHAN TAD SUDER, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRETT MICHAEL PINKUS; MATTHEW CARMINE PHILLIPS, Renaissance IP Law Group LLP, Portland, OR. KEVIN GOLDMAN, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also repre- sented by MARK CHRISTOPHER FLEMING; JACK S. BARUFKA, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA; EVAN FINKEL, Los Angeles, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 6, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.