Surfcast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Surfcast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SURFCAST, INC., Appellant v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________ 2015-1568 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013- 00292, IPR2013-00293, IPR2013-00294, IPR2013-00295. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOHN ALLCOCK, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by KATHRYN RILEY GRASSO, STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI III; ERICA PASCAL, San Francisco, CA; JAMES M. HEINTZ, Reston, VA. JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ANNA MAYERGOYZ WEINBERG, WONJOO SUH, JEFFREY PAUL KUSHAN, SCOTT BORDER; CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR., RICHARD ALAN CEDEROTH, Chicago, IL.
MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also repre- sented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, BRIAN RACILLA, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (TARANTO, SCHALL, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 9, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.