U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2016

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided May 26, 2016

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants DELL INC., APPLE INC., SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:11-cv-00474-MHS, 6:11-cv-00674-MHS, 6:11-cv-00676-MHS, Judge Michael H. Schneider. ______________________ ORDER ______________________ 2 PROFECTUS TECH. LLC v. HUAWEI TECHS. CO., LTD.

Before MOORE, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On October 27, 2015, we ordered the parties to pre- pare to show cause at oral argument as to why sanctions should not be imposed for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d). The parties addressed the issue of sanctions at oral argument and refiled corrected briefing and ap- pendices following oral argument. Regarding the show- cause order on October 27, 2015, we decline to impose sanctions for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).

IT IS ORDERED THAT: Sanctions are not imposed.

FOR THE COURT May 26, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.