Kermes v. Dhs
Kermes v. Dhs
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
DAVID KERMES, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent ______________________
2015-3148 ______________________
Petition for review of an arbitrator's decision by Edna E.J. Francis. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JIM CALLE, Law Office of Jim E. Calle, P.C., Tucson, AZ, argued for petitioner.
CHRISTOPHER KEITH WIMBUSH, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ALLISON KIDD-MILLER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, SCHALL and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 14, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished