Kermes v. Dhs

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Kermes v. Dhs

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DAVID KERMES, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent ______________________

2015-3148 ______________________

Petition for review of an arbitrator's decision by Edna E.J. Francis. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JIM CALLE, Law Office of Jim E. Calle, P.C., Tucson, AZ, argued for petitioner.

CHRISTOPHER KEITH WIMBUSH, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ALLISON KIDD-MILLER. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, SCHALL and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 14, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished