Davis v. Navy
Davis v. Navy
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
KEITH J. DAVIS, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent ______________________
2015-3217 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. PH-0752-12-0073-B-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARSHALL J. TINKLE, Hirshon Law Group, P.C., Port- land, ME, argued for petitioner.
SHARI A. ROSE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 3, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished