Davis v. Navy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Davis v. Navy

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

KEITH J. DAVIS, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent ______________________

2015-3217 ______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. PH-0752-12-0073-B-1. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MARSHALL J. TINKLE, Hirshon Law Group, P.C., Port- land, ME, argued for petitioner.

SHARI A. ROSE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 3, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished