U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2016

Davis v. Navy

Davis v. Navy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided August 3, 2016

Davis v. Navy

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ KEITH J. DAVIS, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent ______________________ 2015-3217 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. PH-0752-12-0073-B-1. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MARSHALL J. TINKLE, Hirshon Law Group, P.C., Port- land, ME, argued for petitioner.

SHARI A. ROSE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judg- es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 3, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.