U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2016

Fries v. United States

Fries v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided August 12, 2016

Fries v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RICHARD G. FRIES, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2016-1242 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00758-TCW, Judge Thomas C.

Wheeler. …………………………………………………………..

RICHARD G. FRIES, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2016-1304 ______________________ 2 FRIES v. US

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00647-TCW, Judge Thomas C.

Wheeler. ______________________ Decided: August 12, 2016 ______________________ RICHARD G. FRIES, JR., Atlantic Beach, FL, pro se.

AARON WOODWARD, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee in 16-1242.

RENEE GERBER, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, for defendant-appellee in 16-1304. Also repre- sented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., FRANKLIN E. WHITE, JR., DONALD E. KINNER. ______________________ Before NEWMAN, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Richard G. Fries appeals the dismissal of these ac- tions by the Court of Federal Claims, as not within that court’s jurisdiction, or for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

Appeal No. 2016-1242 relates to Mr. Fries’ contention that an unnamed third party was the victim of a dental scam, and requests damages in the amount of 2.5 million dollars. Such a cause of action, sounding in tort, is not within the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.

Appeal No. 2016-1304 concerns various allegations regarding drug testing, searches and seizures, and Mr. Fries’ credit rating. Again, the Court of Federal Claims correctly held that Mr. Fries has not stated a cause within the jurisdiction of that court.

FRIES v. US 3

The dismissals are AFFIRMED.

No costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.