Capital Dynamics v. Cambridge Associates, LLC
Capital Dynamics v. Cambridge Associates, LLC
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CAPITAL DYNAMICS, Appellant
v.
CAMBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellee ______________________
2016-1318 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2014- 00079. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
EDMOND R. BANNON, Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by JONATHAN A. MARSHALL.
DALILA ARGAEZ WENDLANDT, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JON STEVEN BAUGHMAN, JORDAN ROSSEN, DARRELL STARK, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 9, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished