U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2016

Capital Dynamics v. Cambridge Associates, LLC

Capital Dynamics v. Cambridge Associates, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 9, 2016

Capital Dynamics v. Cambridge Associates, LLC

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAPITAL DYNAMICS, Appellant v. CAMBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2016-1318 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2014- 00079. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ EDMOND R. BANNON, Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by JONATHAN A. MARSHALL.

DALILA ARGAEZ WENDLANDT, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JON STEVEN BAUGHMAN, JORDAN ROSSEN, DARRELL STARK, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 9, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.