Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh v. Arcelormittal
Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh v. Arcelormittal
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
VOESTALPINE STAHL GMBH, Appellant
v.
ARCELORMITTAL, Appellee ______________________
2016-1407 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,214, 95/001,350, 95/001,353. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MAXWELL JAMES PETERSEN, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant.
DAVID JAMES CUSHING, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by RICHARD CLAY TURNER; MARK JAMES DEBOY, Edell Shapiro and Finnan, Gaithersburg, MD. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished