Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh v. Arcelormittal
Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh v. Arcelormittal
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VOESTALPINE STAHL GMBH, Appellant v. ARCELORMITTAL, Appellee ______________________ 2016-1407 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,214, 95/001,350, 95/001,353. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MAXWELL JAMES PETERSEN, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant.
DAVID JAMES CUSHING, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by RICHARD CLAY TURNER; MARK JAMES DEBOY, Edell Shapiro and Finnan, Gaithersburg, MD. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.