Datatreasury Corporation v. Fiserv, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Datatreasury Corporation v. Fiserv, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DATATREASURY CORPORATION, Appellant

v.

FISERV, INC., Appellee ______________________

2016-1229, 2016-1230 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. CBM2014-00087, CBM2014-00088. ______________________

Decided: October 13, 2016 ______________________

EDWARD K. CHIN, Albritton Law Firm, Longview, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DEREK TOD GILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, Daingerfield, TX; CHRISTIAN JOHN HURT, Dallas, TX.

DAVID ALAN ROODMAN, Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH C. CARVER, EMMA CATHRENE HARTY, NICK E. WILLIAMSON; ROBERT GERARD LANCASTER, Santa Monica, CA. ______________________ 2 DATATREASURY CORPORATION v. FISERV, INC.

Before MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. We deny the appeal as moot in light of our order in DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information, No. 16-1046.

Reference

Status
Unpublished