Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NETFLIX, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee

v.

ROVI CORPORATION, ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, ROVI GUIDES, INC., FKA GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC., UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants

APTIV DIGITAL, INC., STARSIGHT TELECAST, INC., Counterclaimants-Appellants ______________________

2015-1917 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:11-cv-06591-PJH, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MICHAEL SOONUK KWUN, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim de- fendant-appellee. Also represented by ASHOK RAMANI, SHARIF E. JACOB, EDWARD A. BAYLEY.

JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellants and counterclaimants-appellants. Also represented by MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR.; JOHN M. WHEALAN, Chevy Chase, MD; LAWRENCE MILTON HADLEY, RODERICK GEORGE DORMAN, McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C., Los Angeles, CA; JOEL LANCE THOLLANDER, McKool Smith, PC, Austin, TX.

CHARLES R. MACEDO, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, for amici curiae Broadband iTV, Inc., Double Rock Corporation, Island Intellectual Property, LLC, Access Control Advantage, Inc., Fairway Financial U.S., Inc. Also represented by SANDRA A. HUDAK. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 7, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished