Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
NETFLIX, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee
v.
ROVI CORPORATION, ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, ROVI GUIDES, INC., FKA GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC., UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants
APTIV DIGITAL, INC., STARSIGHT TELECAST, INC., Counterclaimants-Appellants ______________________
2015-1917 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:11-cv-06591-PJH, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL SOONUK KWUN, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim de- fendant-appellee. Also represented by ASHOK RAMANI, SHARIF E. JACOB, EDWARD A. BAYLEY.
JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellants and counterclaimants-appellants. Also represented by MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR.; JOHN M. WHEALAN, Chevy Chase, MD; LAWRENCE MILTON HADLEY, RODERICK GEORGE DORMAN, McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C., Los Angeles, CA; JOEL LANCE THOLLANDER, McKool Smith, PC, Austin, TX.
CHARLES R. MACEDO, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, for amici curiae Broadband iTV, Inc., Double Rock Corporation, Island Intellectual Property, LLC, Access Control Advantage, Inc., Fairway Financial U.S., Inc. Also represented by SANDRA A. HUDAK. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 7, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished