In Re: Shore
In Re: Shore
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: MICHAEL WAYNE SHORE, Appellant
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN RE: PETER WHITE, MICHAEL WAYNE SHORE, WOLFRED CHARLES ATTAL, III, Appellants ______________________
2016-1461, 2016-1462 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 11/491,269, 11/588,627. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN DAVID SIMMONS, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellants. Also represented by STEPHEN EMERSON MURRAY; MICHAEL W. SHORE, Shore Chan DePumpo LLP, Dallas, TX.
ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, COKE MORGAN STEWART, LORA DRISCOLL. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (REYNA, LINN, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 10, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished