Martinez v. United States
Martinez v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
DANIEL GABINO MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2016-2168 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:11-cv-00751-EDK, Judge Elaine Kaplan. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
A. BLAIR DUNN, Western Agriculture, Resource and Business Advocates, LLP, Albuquerque, NM, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DORI ELLEN RICHARDS.
ELIZABETH ANN PETERSON, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN C. CRUDEN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 15, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished