Aat Bioquest, Inc. v. Texas Fluorescence
Aat Bioquest, Inc. v. Texas Fluorescence
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
AAT BIOQUEST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________
2016-2056 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. ______________________
Decided: February 15, 2017 ______________________
KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN.
RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendant- appellant. ______________________
Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges. 2 AAT BIOQUEST, INC. v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE
PER CURIAM. On this limited record and in light of the arguments raised, the district court judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished