Aat Bioquest, Inc. v. Texas Fluorescence

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Aat Bioquest, Inc. v. Texas Fluorescence

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

AAT BIOQUEST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________

2016-2056 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. ______________________

Decided: February 15, 2017 ______________________

KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN.

RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendant- appellant. ______________________

Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges. 2 AAT BIOQUEST, INC. v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE

PER CURIAM. On this limited record and in light of the arguments raised, the district court judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED

Reference

Status
Unpublished