Aat Bioquest, Inc. v. Texas Fluorescence

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________

AAT BIOQUEST, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee v.

TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant ______________________

2016-2056 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu.

______________________ Decided: February 15, 2017 ______________________

KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN.

RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendant- appellant.

______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit

Judges.

2 AAT BIOQUEST, INC. v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE PER CURIAM.

On this limited record and in light of the arguments raised, the district court judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED